We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
REGULATION OF MONOPOLISTIC METHODS.
- Authors
Werner, Ray O.; Griffiths, L. C.; Kirk-Duggan, Michael A.
- Abstract
The article presents U.S. legal cases and developments in marketing relative to the regulation of monopolistic methods. In reference to market control the Federal Trade Commission v. Elders Grain, Inc., et al., the United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. and Nabisco Brands, Inc., and the Caremark Homecare, Inc. v. New England Critical Care, Inc., et al. cases are cited. In reference to market exclusion tactics the Arnold Pontiac v. General Motors, Main Street Publishers v. Landmark Communications, the Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corp. v. Donnelley Information Publishing, and the Redmond v. Missouri Western State College cases are presented.
- Subjects
UNITED States; MONOPOLY laws; UNITED States. Federal Trade Commission; ARCHER Daniels Midland Co.; MERGERS &; acquisitions law; RESTRAINT of trade; PRICE regulation; COVENANTS not to compete; COMMERCIAL law; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law)
- Publication
Journal of Marketing, 1989, Vol 53, Issue 4, p84
- ISSN
0022-2429
- Publication type
Article