We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Parameterizing agreement features in Arabic, Bantu languages, and varieties of English.
- Authors
van Gelderen, Elly
- Abstract
Subject-verb (SV) and verb-subject (VS) structures differ where agreement is concerned. The question to be answered is why languages display less verbal agreement in VS structures than in SV structures. Within a government-binding framework, the problem has been accounted for (e.g. by Koopman and Sportiche 1991) by arguing that there is a real Spec-Head agreement relationship in SV structures (with the subject in the specifier position and the verb in the head of a functional projection) but a government relationship in VS structures (with the moved verb governing the subject position). In this paper, 1 explain the different agreement patterns in Arabic, Kirundi/Kinyarwandi, and Belfast English through a modification of the minimalist framework (cf. Chomsky 1992). I argue that in VS structures, expletives are responsible for the agreement (and the "breakdown" of agreement). Expletives, which may for instance be specified for singular number, are inserted and check some of the phi features. The other features are checked after the NP moves at LF. "Dividing tip" the agreement (or phi) features accounts for a number of "breakdowns" in agreement in the other two languages as well.
- Subjects
VERBS; NOUN phrases (Grammar); ARABIC language; BANTU languages; ENGLISH language; LANGUAGE &; languages; LEXICAL grammar
- Publication
Linguistics, 1996, Vol 34, Issue 4, p753
- ISSN
0024-3949
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1515/ling.1996.34.4.753