We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Criminal Sentencing by Preferred Numbers.
- Authors
Dhami, Mandeep K.; Belton, Ian K.; Merrall, Elizabeth; McGrath, Andrew; Bird, Sheila M.
- Abstract
Criminal sentencing is a complex cognitive activity often performed by the unaided mind under suboptimal conditions. As such, sentencers may not behave according to policy, guidelines, or training. We analyzed the distribution of sentences meted out in one year in two different jurisdictions (i.e., England and Wales, and New South Wales, Australia). We reveal that sentencers prefer certain numbers when meting out sentence lengths (in custody and community service) and amounts (for fines/compensation). These "common doses" accounted for over 90 percent of sentences in each jurisdiction. The size of these doses increased as sentences became more severe, and doses followed a logarithmic pattern. Our findings are compatible with psychological research on preferred numbers and are reminiscent of Weber's and Fechner's laws. The findings run contrary to arguments against efforts to reduce judicial discretion, and potentially undermine the notion of individualized justice, as well as raise questions about the (cost) effectiveness of sentencing.
- Subjects
WALES; NEW South Wales; CRIMINAL sentencing; WEBER-Fechner law; PSYCHOLOGICAL research; JUDICIAL discretion; VOLUNTEER service
- Publication
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2020, Vol 17, Issue 1, p139
- ISSN
1740-1453
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/jels.12246