We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Comparison of Interviewer-Administered and Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recalls in 3 Diverse Integrated Health Systems.
- Authors
Thompson, Frances E.; Dixit-Joshi, Sujata; Potischman, Nancy; Dodd, Kevin W.; Kirkpatrick, Sharon I.; Kushi, Lawrence H.; Alexander, Gwen L.; Coleman, Laura A.; Zimmerman, Thea P.; Sundaram, Maria E.; Clancy, Heather A.; Groesbeck, Michelle; Douglass, Deirdre; George, Stephanie M.; Schap, TusaRebecca E.; Subar, Amy F.
- Abstract
Twenty-four-hour dietary recalls provide high-quality intake data but have been prohibitively expensive for large epidemiologic studies. This study's goal was to assess whether the web-based Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Recall (ASA24) performs similarly enough to the standard interviewer-administered, Automated Multiple-Pass Method (AMPM) 24-hour dietary recall to be considered a viable alternative. In 2010-2011, 1,081 adults from 3 integrated health systems in Detroit, Michigan; Marshfield,Wisconsin; and Kaiser-Permanente Northern California participated in a field trial. A quota design ensured a diverse sample by sex, age, and race/ethnicity. Each participant was asked to complete 2 recalls and was randomly assigned to 1 of 4 protocols differing by type of recall and administration order. For energy, the mean intakes were 2,425 versus 2,374 kcal for men and 1,876 versus 1,906 kcal for women by AMPM and ASA24, respectively. Of 20 nutrients/food groups analyzed and controlling for false discovery rate, 87%were judged equivalent at the 20% bound. ASA24 was preferred overAMPM by 70% of the respondents. Attrition was lower in the ASA24/AMPM study group than in the AMPM/ASA24 group, and it was lower in the ASA24/ASA24 group than in the AMPM/AMPM group. ASA24 offers the potential to collect high-quality dietary intake information at low cost with less attrition.
- Subjects
COMPARATIVE studies; CONFIDENCE intervals; DIET; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL research; INGESTION; INTEGRATED health care delivery; INTERNET; MEMORY; NUTRITION; POPULATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH funding; SELF medication; TELEPHONES; ACQUISITION of data; EVALUATION of human services programs; DATA analysis software; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; ODDS ratio
- Publication
American Journal of Epidemiology, 2015, Vol 181, Issue 12, p970
- ISSN
0002-9262
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1093/aje/kwu467