We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
「恶的谕瞪」熊法得到辩覆一侗模熊懊疑谕的策略.
- Authors
冯害怡
- Abstract
William Rowe, an atheist, proposes an argument from evil against the existence of God. This argument has a modal premise, which says that probably God does not exist. Skeptical theists attempt to argue against it by showing that its modal premise cannot be justified due to human cognitive limitations. One strategy is to apply Peter van Inwagen's modal skepticism: because of our cognitive limitations, to establish extraordinary possibilities is beyond our reach. However, none of the extant arguments for modal skepticism are tenable, which renders modal skepticism, as well as its application in response to atheism, unpersuasive. This article defends modal skepticism and applies it in response to Rowe's argument from evil.
- Subjects
SKEPTICISM; PROOF of God; ATHEISM; GOOD &; evil; ARGUMENT; POSSIBILITY
- Publication
Logos & Pneuma, 2022, Issue 56, p289
- ISSN
1023-2583
- Publication type
Article