We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Comparing Nonlinear Regression and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Assessment of Prediction Uncertainty in Vadose Zone Modeling.
- Authors
Shi, Xiaoqing; Ye, Ming; Finsterle, Stefan; Wu, Jichun
- Abstract
Evaluating predictive performance of regression confidence intervals and Bayesian credible intervals is important for uncertainty quantification in model-data fusion. In this study numerical analyses showed that Bayesian intervals have better predictive performance and that MCMC simulation is computationally more efficient than regression analysis. In vadose zone modeling, parameter estimates and model predictions are inherently uncertain, regardless of quality and quantity of data used in model-data fusion. Accurate quantification of the uncertainty is necessary to design future data collection for improving the predictive capability of models. This study is focused on evaluating predictive performance of two commonly used methods of uncertainty quantification: nonlinear regression and Bayesian methods. The former quantifies predictive uncertainty using the regression confidence interval (RCI), whereas the latter uses the Bayesian credible interval (BCI); neither RCI nor BCI includes measurement errors. When measurement errors are considered, the counterparts of RCI and BCI are regression prediction interval (RPI) and Bayesian prediction interval (BPI), respectively. The predictive performance is examined through a cross-validation study of two-phase flow modeling, and predictive logscore is used as the performance measure. The linear and nonlinear RCI and RPI are evaluated using UCODE_2005. The nonlinear RCI performs better than the linear RCI, and the nonlinear RPI outperforms the linear RPI. The Bayesian intervals are calculated using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques implemented with the differential evolution adaptive metropolis (DREAM) algorithm. The BCI/BPI obtained from DREAM has better predictive performance than the linear and nonlinear RCI/RPI. Different from observations in other studies, it is found that estimating nonlinear RCI/RPI is not computationally more efficient than estimating BCI/BPI in this case with low-dimensional parameter space and a large number of predictions. MCMC methods are thus more appealing than nonlinear regression methods for uncertainty quantification in vadose zone modeling.
- Subjects
NUMERICAL analysis; REGRESSION analysis; MONTE Carlo method; MARKOV processes; ZONE of aeration
- Publication
Vadose Zone Journal, 2012, Vol 11, Issue 4, p11
- ISSN
1539-1663
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.2136/vzj2011.0147