We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Fictional reference: How to Account for both Directedness and Uniformity.
- Authors
Voltolini, Alberto
- Abstract
In the old days of descriptivism, fictional reference and non-fictional reference with proper names were treated on a par. Descriptivism was not an intuitive theory, but it meritoriously provided a unitary semantic account of names, whether referentially full or empty. Then the revolution of the new theory of reference occurred. This new theory is definitely more intuitive than descriptivism, yet it comes with a drawback: the referentially full use and the referentially empty use, notably the fictional use, of names are semantically no longer on the same footing. How the use of names from fiction is referentially empty has even been seen as a symptom of its not being a use at all. In this paper, I ask the following question: can one keep the merits of the new theory of reference and still provide a unitary account of both fictional and non-fictional reference with names? My answer is positive, provided that one conceives proper names as a special kind of indexicals.
- Subjects
SEMANTICS; INFORMATION theory; COMPARATIVE linguistics; INDEXICALS (Semantics); SEMANTICS (Philosophy); UNIFORMITY; NONFICTION
- Publication
British Journal of Aesthetics, 2022, Vol 62, Issue 2, p291
- ISSN
0007-0904
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1093/aesthj/ayab052