We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
RECLAIMING THE RIGHT TO KNOW: THE CASE FOR CONSIDERING DERIVATIVE BENEFITS IN FOIA'S PERSONAL PRIVACY EXEMPTIONS.
- Authors
Frey, Robert
- Abstract
The Freedom of Information Act provides the public with a statutory right to access troves of government information with nine limited exemptions. Two of those exemptions--Exemption 6 and Exemption 7(C)--protect the personal privacy of people mentioned within the government's files, allowing the government to withhold personally identifiable information if disclosure would cause an "unwarranted" invasion of privacy. Under the Supreme Court's precedent, courts must conduct a balancing test to determine whether disclosure is unwarranted, weighing the privacy interests of the individuals mentioned in the requested documents against the public's interest in disclosure. The Supreme Court has clarified that disclosure can only serve the public interest if disclosure will reveal something about the government's actions, thus allowing the public to oversee the government's performance. The Supreme Court has acknowledged that it has left a critical aspect of the balancing test undefined, however. It has never explicitly decided whether disclosure must directly and immediately reveal something about the government's conduct, or whether the public interest can be served derivatively by using the requested information to uncover additional information outside of the requested documents that reveals the government's actions. This Note argues that the Supreme Court actually has answered this question and that courts must consider derivative benefits as part of the public interest. The Supreme Court has repeatedly, though tacitly, considered indirect and derivative harms to personal privacy. After identifying the Court's tacit pattern, this Note argues that the statute's language and the Court's own logic require derivative benefits to receive the same treatment as derivative harms. Finally, this Note examines how this problem has been dealt with by the federal circuits and identifies the fault lines along which the circuits are beginning to split.
- Subjects
FREEDOM of Information Act (U.S.); PRIVACY; UNITED States. Supreme Court; FREEDOM of information; INFORMATION policy; PUBLIC interest; UNITED States appellate courts
- Publication
Virginia Law Review, 2021, Vol 107, Issue 7, p1499
- ISSN
0042-6601
- Publication type
Article