We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
C v D: A Missed Opportunity to Clarify the Distinction Between Jurisdiction and Admissibility.
- Authors
Matos, Shaun
- Abstract
The distinction between issues of jurisdiction and admissibility is at the heart of arbitration law due to the role it plays in defining the relationship between tribunals and the courts of the seat. Nevertheless, there has long been controversy as to the foundation of the distinction and on which side of the line the issue of alleged non‐compliance with pre‐arbitration steps falls. C v D offered a rare opportunity for an apex court to consider the distinction between issues of jurisdiction and admissibility, and to resolve these controversies. Whilst the judgment provides certainty on some matters, the reasoning adopted creates more confusion than it resolves and is unlikely to be the final word on the matter.
- Subjects
ADMISSIBLE evidence; JURISDICTION; ARBITRATION &; award; LEGAL judgments; ADMINISTRATIVE courts
- Publication
Modern Law Review, 2024, Vol 87, Issue 3, p715
- ISSN
0026-7961
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/1468-2230.12865