We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Why Sibley Is (Probably) Not a Particularist After All.
- Authors
Kirwin, Claire
- Abstract
Anna Bergqvist claims that Frank Sibley—despite his own claims to the contrary—should be considered a particularist when it comes to aesthetics. In this paper I argue that whilst Sibley does hold many of the views that Dancy advances in his Ethics without Principles, Bergqvist is certainly wrong to present Sibley's position as ‘uncontroversially’ particularist. In fact, the relationship between Sibley's account of judgement in aesthetics and Dancy's ethical particularism serves to highlight several ambiguities involved in the particularist–generalist debate as Bergqvist presents it.
- Subjects
AESTHETICS; AESTHETIC judgment; PARTICULARITY (Aesthetics); SIBLEY, Frank; DANCY, Jonathan; ETHICS Without Principles (Book)
- Publication
British Journal of Aesthetics, 2011, Vol 51, Issue 2, p201
- ISSN
0007-0904
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1093/aesthj/ayr005