We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
EBNEO Commentary: Non‐invasive high‐frequency oscillatory ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as postextubation support for preterm neonates in China: A randomized clinical trial
- Authors
Almudares, Faeq; Gandhi, Bheru
- Abstract
The article discusses a randomized clinical trial comparing three non-invasive ventilation (NIV) modes for preterm neonates in China: nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV), nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP), and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). The study found that NHFOV was not significantly different from NIPPV in terms of effectiveness, but it was more effective than NCPAP in preventing re-intubation. However, NHFOV did not impact the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). The trial showed that NHFOV was safe and had potential advantages over NCPAP, but further research is needed to confirm its short-term benefits and long-term efficacy and safety.
- Subjects
CHINA; POSITIVE pressure ventilation; HIGH-frequency ventilation (Therapy); CONTINUOUS positive airway pressure; NONINVASIVE ventilation; CLINICAL trials; NEWBORN infants; POSITIVE end-expiratory pressure
- Publication
Acta Paediatrica, 2024, Vol 113, Issue 3, p623
- ISSN
0803-5253
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/apa.17088