We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Retraction Stigma and its Communication via Retraction Notices.
- Authors
Xu, Shaoxiong Brian; Hu, Guangwei
- Abstract
Retraction of published research is laudable as a post-publication self-correction of science but undesirable as an indicator of grave violations of research and publication ethics. Given its various adverse consequences, retraction has a stigmatizing effect both in and beyond the academic community. However, little theoretical attention has been paid to the stigmatizing nature of retraction. Drawing on stigma theories and informed by research on retraction, we advance a conceptualization of retraction as stigma. We define retraction stigma as a discrediting evaluation of the professional competence and academic ethics of the entities held accountable for retraction. Accordingly, we identify seven core dimensions of retraction stigma, consider its functional justifications at both social and psychological levels, and distinguish its various targets and stakeholders. In view of the central role of retraction notices, we also discuss how retraction stigma is communicated via retraction notices and how authors of retraction notices may exercise their retraction stigma power and manipulate the stigmatizing force of retraction notices. We conclude by recommending retraction stigma as a theoretical framework for future research on retraction and pointing out several directions that this research can take.
- Subjects
RETRACTION letters; STIGMATIZATION; COMMUNICATION; ADULTS; HIGHER education
- Publication
Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning & Policy, 2022, Vol 60, Issue 3, p349
- ISSN
0026-4695
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s11024-022-09465-w