We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
REMARKS ON THE DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT NO. 257/2017 REGARDING THE TERM FOR INTRODUCING THE CIVILLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY.
- Authors
BARBU, Denisa
- Abstract
The civilly responsible party can be introduced, according to art 21, section (1), C.C.P., as modified through CCR Decision up until the end of the criminal persecution by the person in right according to the civil law, in order to be able to formulate requests and to raise exceptions in the preliminary chamber. So, the civil party, as the person in right by the civil law, can ask to be introduced the civilly responsible party by the end of the criminal prosecution. On the other hand, the injured person can constitute as a civil party, as art. 20, section (1) C.C.P. statues, up until the beginning of the judicial research. Therefore, in the situation that the civil party is not constituted up until the beginning of the preliminary chamber and she does not ask to be introduced the civilly responsible party is there an infringement of the right of the prosecuted? Nor the ones of the civilly responsible party? Are there any remedies?.
- Subjects
CONSTITUTIONAL courts; LEGAL judgments; CIVIL rights; PROSECUTION; DISABILITY rights movement; STATUES
- Publication
Valahia University Law Study, 2020, Vol 35, Issue 1, p73
- ISSN
2247-9937
- Publication type
Article