We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Diverting and Abdicating Judicial Discretion: Cultural, Political, and Procedural Dynamics in California Juvenile Justice.
- Authors
Harris, Alexes
- Abstract
Although tensions between substantive and formal rationality in the adult criminal justice system have received a great deal of attention, the existence of these tensions in the juvenile justice system has received little scholarly consideration. I seek to remedy this gap by exploring how punitive policies associated with the war on crime impact the formal and informal process of justice, the court community and work group, and the exercise of discretion in the juvenile courts. Drawing on qualitative data collected in three juvenile courts in Southern California, I identify the mechanisms by which prosecutors divert judicial discretion from the traditional rehabilitation-oriented bench officers to bench officers who are more accepting of the criminalization of juveniles. In addition, I investigate how and why rehabilitation-oriented bench officers at times abdicate their decisionmaking authority and make rulings that contradict their own assessments. My findings suggest that as the war on crime is extended to youth, the juvenile courts increasingly share the criminal courts' emphasis on offense rather than offender, enhanced prosecutorial power, and adversarial relationships within the court.
- Subjects
JUVENILE justice administration; JUVENILE corrections; JUVENILE courts; JUVENILE diversion programs; CRIMINAL justice system; JUSTICE administration; CHILDREN'S rights; JUVENILE delinquency; CRIMINAL law; COURTS
- Publication
Law & Society Review, 2007, Vol 41, Issue 2, p387
- ISSN
0023-9216
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00302.x