We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Ethics After Comparative Religious Ethics: Rereading Little and Twiss in a Pragmatic Light.
- Authors
Lee, Jung H.
- Abstract
This paper presents a rereading of David Little and Sumner Twiss's Comparative Religious Ethics in the context of its initial reception and legacy within the field of religious ethics and argues that we can read it more charitably as a piece of pragmatism rather than as a work of formalism or semi‐formalism. If one does not read Little and Twiss as committed positivists concerned with realizing a specific research program associated with the "twilight of logical empiricism," then their theoretical and methodological recommendations, illustrated in their case studies, appear more pragmatic in nature and less excessively rigid. By rereading Comparative Religious Ethics in this light, we can see more clearly its relevance for the field today, particularly regarding the fundamental importance of the discursive activity of practical reasoning, or the game of giving and asking for reasons, in the study of religious ethics.
- Subjects
RELIGIOUS ethics; PRACTICAL reason; LOGICAL positivism; ETHICS; TWILIGHT; RELIGIOUS studies
- Publication
Journal of Religious Ethics, 2024, Vol 52, Issue 1, p71
- ISSN
0384-9694
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/jore.12450