We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA DENGAN ALASAN EFISIENSI PASCA PERPU CIPTA KERJA (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1345 K/PDT.SUS-PHI/2022).
- Authors
Basri, Bryan Alexander; Rasji
- Abstract
This article want to find out what is the judge's ratio on layoff dispute because of efficiency as of Article 43 on Peraturan Pemerintah Number 35 of 2021. Article 43 section 1 that rules out layoff because of efficiency because the employer suffered economical loss, could be proved with either internal or external audit report. Indonesia's supreme court decision number 1345K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2022 then changed judex factie decision which implicitly stated that annual financial report is qualified as a proof as of Article 43 section 1 stated which the phrase 'antara lain' should have been annuled by Indonesian supreme court, in which Indonesian supreme court constitute the injustice further.
- Publication
Journal of Syntax Literate, 2024, Vol 9, Issue 1, p31
- ISSN
2541-0849
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i1.14732