We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Preemption of Local Smoke-Free Air Ordinances: The Implications of Judicial Opinions for Meeting National Health Objectives.
- Authors
O'Connor, Jean C.; MacNeil, Allison; Chriqui, Jamie F.; Tynan, Michael; Bates, Hannalori; Eidson, Shelby K. S.
- Abstract
Elimination of state laws that preempt local antismoking ordinances is a national health objective. However, the tobacco industry and its supporters have continued to pursue statelevel preemption of local tobacco control ordinances as part of an apparent strategy to avoid the difusion of grassroots antismoking initiatives. And, an increasing number of challenges to local ordinances by the tobacco industry and persons supported by the tobacco industry are being decided in state supreme courts and courts of appeals. The outcomes of seemingly similar cases about the validity of local smoke-free air ordinances vary signifcantly by state. This paper examines the common and unique aspects of the decisions and the potential implications of court rulings on preemption for future state tobacco control eforts and achievement of national health objectives around the elimination of preemption. Using a search strategy developed for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation (STATE) System, cases where a state or federal appellate level court made a fnding on the validity of a local smoke-free air ordinance or regulation were identifed in 19 states. In contrast to previous studies, we found that cases in approximately half of states were decided for local governments. We also found that across the states, courts were considering similar factors in their decisions including the extent to which: (1) the local government possessed the authority to pass the ordinance, (2) the ordinance conficted with the state constitution, and (3) state statutes preempt the ordinance.
- Subjects
SMOKING laws; SMOKING cessation; HEALTH promotion; TOBACCO industry; CENTERS for Disease Control &; Prevention (U.S.); GOVERNMENT programs
- Publication
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2008, Vol 36, Issue 2, p403
- ISSN
1073-1105
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00284.x