The article offers information on the decision of the Minnesota Court of Appeals in the cases related to criminal law. The cases discussed include State v. Tate on allowing police officer to testify via Zoom due to his covid-19 exposure did not violate the defendant's right to confrontation and Borth v. Borth on Proof of intent to have a substantial adverse effect on safety, security, or privacy is not required for HRO based on dissemination of private sexual images.