We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Regulation by Threat: Dodd-Frank and the Nonbank Problem.
- Authors
Schwarcz, Daniel; Zaring, David
- Abstract
A central lesson of the global financial crisis is that banks are not the only financial firms that can endanger the broader financial system. The Dodd-Frank Act responded to this reality by empowering a council of financial regulators to designate individual nonbank financial institutions as systemically risky. Although the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) has exercised this authority only four times, it has occasioned controversy in court, in Congress, and among commentators. And with Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential victory, FSOC’s designation authority is now in danger of being radically altered or terminated completely. This Article defends the FSOC designation scheme, arguing that its critics misunderstand the mechanisms by which it helps to reduce systemic risk outside the banking sector. FSOC designation does not, and cannot, precisely identify firms that could pose a systemic risk to the financial system. FSOC’s broad discretion to impose costly sanctions on designated firms instead advances two quite different goals. First, it deters nonbank firms from seeking out systemically risky strategies or activities. Second, it holds financial regulators to account by threatening to intrude on their regulatory turf if they fail to address systemic risk on their own. We term this approach “regulation by threat” and suggest that it is appropriate when risks are hard to identify, the perils of mistake are great, and the downsides of misdiagnosis extreme. Moreover, we argue that the council’s discretion is better cabined by its structure— which features diverse membership, voting, review, and political safeguards—than by insistence on “hard look” judicial review or a cost-benefit requirement for individual designation decisions. The council offers a useful alternative mechanism to standard approaches to regulation.
- Subjects
DODD-Frank Wall Street Reform &; Consumer Protection Act; UNITED States. Financial Stability Oversight Council; NONBANK financial institutions; GLOBAL Financial Crisis, 2008-2009; AMERICAN International Group Inc.
- Publication
University of Chicago Law Review, 2017, Vol 84, Issue 4, p1813
- ISSN
0041-9494
- Publication type
Article