We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
ERISA PREEMPTION.
- Abstract
The article discusses several court cases related to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). In the Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. Schieffer, the court held that the benefits given to just one employee in an individual employment agreement do not constitute ERISA benefits. In Loffredo v. Daimler AG, the court noted that ERISA provision with respect to fiduciary duties are not applicable to a company's top-hat plans although top-hat plans are governed by the enforcement and preemption provisions of ERISA.
- Subjects
ACTIONS &; defenses (Law); RETIREMENT income laws; FIDUCIARY accounting; RETIREMENT planning; EMPLOYEE benefits; MINNESOTA &; Eastern Railroad Corp.
- Publication
Benefits Quarterly, 2012, Vol 28, Issue 3, p53
- ISSN
8756-1263
- Publication type
Article