We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Because they do horrible things: Fear, science, and the erosion of civil liberties in sexually violent predator proceedings.
- Authors
PETRILA, JOHN
- Abstract
The United States Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of statutes that permit the indefinite confinement of individuals adjudicated sexually violent predators (SVP). Judicial decisions rejecting a number of challenges to such statutes have occurred against the backdrop of a broader abandonment by the courts of a rights-based approach to mental health law. The fundamental issue that determines whether an individual will be confined under SVP statutes, and if so, for how long, is whether the individual presents a future risk of violence to others. Although the courts have the authority to reject such testimony from mental health professionals, they rarely do so. As a result, SVP hearings are sometimes marked by testimony that overstates the scientific utility of the risk instruments on which it is based; confuses probabilistic with individual likelihood of future risk; and characterizes certain individuals as untreatable as a matter of scientific fact rather than opinion. The result is the erosion of individual liberties and ultimately the credibility of testimony on future risk.
- Subjects
SEX offenders; SEX crimes; SEXUAL aggression; ONLINE sexual predators; CHILD molesters; JUVENILE sex offenders; RAPISTS; INCEST offenders
- Publication
Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 2008, Vol 36, Issue 3, p359
- ISSN
0093-1853
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1177/009318530803600303