We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
IN ACTION FOR DAMAGES FOR VIOLATION OF NO-STRIKE CLAUSE, UNION WAS ENTITLED TO RAISE QUESTION WHETHER SUCH ACTION WAS NOT BARRED BY TERMS OF ARBITRATION CLAUSE, WHILE RESERVING THE RIGHT TO DENY THE EXISTENCE OF THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT IF THE COURT DECIDED ADVERSELY
- Abstract
This article focuses on the court ruling given in Genesco Inc. v. Joint Council 13, United Shoe Workers of America case. In action for damages for violation of no-strike clause, union was entitled to raise question whether such action was not barred by terms of arbitration clause, while reserving the right to deny the existence of the collective bargaining agreement if the court decided adversely.
- Subjects
LEGAL judgments; GENESCO Inc.; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law); NO-strike clause; COMMERCIAL arbitration agreements; COLLECTIVE labor agreements
- Publication
Arbitration Journal, 1965, Vol 20, Issue 2, p126
- ISSN
0003-7893
- Publication type
Article