We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
OWNER OF UNINSURED AUTOMOBILE HAS NO CLAIM AGAINST MVAIC FOR INJURIES SUSTAINED IN ACCIDENT UNDER ENDORSEMENT CONTAINED IN POLICY COVERING SECOND CAR SINCE HE IS NOT AN "INNOCENT VICTIM" THROUGH NO FAULT OF HIS OWN.
- Abstract
This article focuses on the court ruling given in Bullard v. MVAIC case. Owner of uninsured automobile has no claim against MVAIC for injuries sustained in accident under endorsement contained in policy covering second car since he is not an "innocent victim" through no fault of his own. However, if the owner's wife can establish that as a passenger at the time of the accident she did not know that the automobile was uninsured, she may have a claim.
- Subjects
LEGAL judgments; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law); AUTOMOBILE insurance; ARBITRATION &; award; TRAFFIC accident victims; TRAFFIC accidents
- Publication
Arbitration Journal, 1965, Vol 20, Issue 2, p123
- ISSN
0003-7893
- Publication type
Article