We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Early stage periarticular injection during total knee arthroplasty may provide a better postoperative pain relief than late-stage periarticular injection: a randomized-controlled trial.
- Authors
Tsukada, Sachiyuki; Kurosaka, Kenji; Maeda, Tetsuyuki; Iida, Akihiro; Nishino, Masahiro; Hirasawa, Naoyuki
- Abstract
<bold>Purpose: </bold>This study was performed to determine whether periarticular injection performed in the early stage of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) could provide a better postoperative pain relief than periarticular injection performed in the late stage of TKA. The hypothesis was based on the concept that analgesic intervention before the onset of noxious stimuli would be associated with less postoperative pain.<bold>Methods: </bold>A total of 105 participants were randomly assigned to receive superficial injection just prior to arthrotomy (early stage periarticular injection group) or superficial injection after implanting the prosthesis (late-stage periarticular injection group) in patients undergoing unilateral TKA with 1:1 treatment allocation. In both groups, deep injection was performed according to the same schedule (just prior to implanting prosthesis). The solution consisted of 300 mg of ropivacaine, 8 mg of morphine, 40 mg of methylprednisolone, 50 mg of ketoprofen, and 0.3 mg of epinephrine mixed with normal saline to a final volume of 60 mL. All surgeries were managed under general anesthesia without any regional blocks. Registry-specified primary outcome was postoperative pain score at rest measured at the recovery room using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS score was compared between two groups and assessed to reach the reported threshold values for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 10 mm for the postoperative VAS score.<bold>Results: </bold>The VAS score at the recovery room was significantly lower in the early stage periarticular injection group than the late-stage periarticular injection group (23 ± 25 mm versus 39 ± 34 mm, respectively; 95% confidence interval 4-28 mm; p = 0.0078). The mean difference in the primary outcome fulfilled the MCID value.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Bringing forward the timing of periarticular injection may provide significant and clinically meaningful improvement in pain following TKA under general anesthesia.<bold>Level Of Evidence: </bold>I.
- Subjects
PAIN management; POSTOPERATIVE pain; RANDOMIZED controlled trials; ARTIFICIAL knees; ROPIVACAINE; ADRENALINE; ANALGESICS; COMPARATIVE studies; DRUG administration; INTRA-articular injections; LOCAL anesthetics; LONGITUDINAL method; RESEARCH methodology; MEDICAL cooperation; MORPHINE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH; TOTAL knee replacement; EVALUATION research; TREATMENT effectiveness; CARBOCYCLIC acids; GENERAL anesthesia
- Publication
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2019, Vol 27, Issue 4, p1124
- ISSN
0942-2056
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1007/s00167-018-5140-y