We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Reply to Hamer: The R v T controversy: forensic evidence, law and logic.
- Authors
Biedermann, A.; Taroni, F.; Champod, C.
- Abstract
The article discusses response by authors on the paper presented by D. Hamer on the feasibility of the likelihood-ratio tests and bayesian analysis approaches for interpretation of results in court cases concerning forensic analysis. They examine the correctness of the judgment given through the scientific evidences. The probability theory for determination of the accuracy of the methods implied is also included.
- Subjects
LIKELIHOOD ratio tests; BAYESIAN analysis; LEGAL judgments; LEGAL evidence; PROBABILITY theory; FORENSIC sciences
- Publication
Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, Vol 11, Issue 4, p361
- ISSN
1470-8396
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1093/lpr/mgs022