We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Legal Liability of Clinical Ethics Services in Australia: "Should I Be More Worried Than I Am?".
- Authors
Feldman, Sharon L.; Johnston, Carolyn
- Abstract
A key function of clinical ethics services (CESs) is to provide decision-making support to health care providers in ethically challenging cases. Cases referred for ethics consultation are likely to involve diverging views or conflict, or to confront the boundaries of appropriate medical practice. Such cases might also attract legal action due to their contentious nature. As CESs become more prevalent in Australia, this article considers the potential legal liability of a CES and its members. With no reported litigation against a CES in Australia, we look to international experience and first principles. We consider the prospects of a claim in negligence, the most likely legal action against a CES, through application of legal principles to a hypothetical case scenario. We conclude that, although unlikely to be successful at this time, a CES could face answerable claims in negligence brought by patients (and families) who are the subject of ethics case consultation.
- Subjects
AUSTRALIA; MEDICAL ethics consultation; LEGAL liability; DECISION making; ETHICS committees; NEGLIGENCE
- Publication
Journal of Law & Medicine, 2023, Vol 30, Issue 2, p345
- ISSN
1320-159X
- Publication type
Article