We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
The Dilemmas of Constitutional Courts and the Case for a New Design of Kelsenian Institutions.
- Authors
Castillo-Ortiz, Pablo
- Abstract
Legal and political controversies persist about the performance of Kelsenian-type constitutional courts in democratic systems. One of the reasons is that the design of these institutions cannot easily accommodate simultaneous but conflicting demands for the strong protection of democracy and human rights, judicial independence and constitutional restraint. Challenging the dominant approach to the design of contemporary constitutional courts, this article proposes a new way to balance these three values through reforms to the structure of Kelsenian institutions. The proposal seeks to institutionalize constitutional restraint, embedding it into courts' internal functioning rules while, concurrently, emancipating constitutional judges from political control through a reform of appointment procedures. It is argued that the combined effects of these two reforms will produce constitutional courts that are more independent and able to protect the core elements of a democratic political community while, at the same time, increasing constitutional deference to the democratically elected legislator.
- Subjects
CONSTITUTIONAL courts; HUMAN rights; POLITICAL community; DEMOCRACY; CONSTITUTIONAL law
- Publication
Law & Philosophy, 2020, Vol 39, Issue 6, p617
- ISSN
0167-5249
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s10982-020-09378-3