We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Consenting to Prosecutions: The Legal Consequences of Non-compliance With the Requirement: R v Lalchan [2022] EWCA Crim 736.
- Authors
Parpworth, Neil
- Abstract
Thus, since the invalidity of those proceedings through want of consent did not invalidate the indictment as a whole, the appellant's conviction for the count 2 offence remains valid. Keywords: Institution of proceedings; requisite consent to prosecute; Attorney-General; legislative intention; venire de novo EN Institution of proceedings requisite consent to prosecute Attorney-General legislative intention venire de novo 368 371 4 10/12/22 20221001 NES 221001 The appellant had been identified as the alleged perpetrator of anti-Semitic and homophobic graffiti written in permanent marker pen at various bus stops in the London Borough of Barnet.
- Subjects
CONSENT (Law); CRIMINAL procedure; JUDGES; OBSCENITY (Law); LAWYERS
- Publication
Journal of Criminal Law, 2022, Vol 86, Issue 5, p368
- ISSN
0022-0183
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1177/00220183221123417