We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Back from the Brink: The Supreme Court Balks at Extending Apprendi to Upset Most Sentencing.
- Authors
Bibas, Stephanos
- Abstract
Focuses on the ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Ring versus Arizona case, wherein it extended the scope of the Apprendi versus New Jersey case by holding that facts which establish eligibility for the death penalty must be treated as elements and thus require submission to a jury and proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Analysis of the jury-sentencing principle behind the Apprendi versus New Jersey case; Legal issue associated with the Ring versus Arizona case.
- Subjects
RING v. Arizona (Supreme Court case); CRIMINAL sentencing; APPRENDI v. New Jersey (Supreme Court case); LEGAL judgments; UNITED States. Supreme Court
- Publication
Federal Sentencing Reporter, 2002, Vol 15, Issue 2, p79
- ISSN
1053-9867
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1525/fsr.2002.15.2.79