We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Double-Bundle Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Improves Anteromedial Rotatory Instability.
- Authors
Beel, Wouter; Vivacqua, Thiago; Willing, Ryan; Getgood, Alan
- Abstract
Background: New techniques have been proposed to better address anteromedial rotatory instability in a medial collateral ligament (MCL)–injured knee that require an extra graft and more surgical implants, which might not be feasible in every clinical setting. Purpose: To investigate if improved resistance to anteromedial rotatory instability can be achieved by using a single-graft, double-bundle (DB) MCL reconstruction with a proximal fixation more anteriorly on the tibia, in comparison with the gold standard single-bundle (SB) MCL reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic simulator in intact knee, superficial MCL/deep MCL–deficient, and reconstruction states. Three different reconstructions were tested: DB MCL no proximal tibial fixation and DB and SB MCL reconstruction with proximal tibial fixation. Knee kinematics were recorded at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion for the following measurements: 8 N·m of valgus rotation (VR), 5 N·m of external tibial rotation, 5 N·m of internal tibial rotation, combined 89 N of anterior tibial translation and 5 N·m of external rotation for anteromedial rotation (AMR) and anteromedial translation (AMT). The differences between each state for every measurement were analyzed with VR and AMR/AMT as primary outcomes. Results: Cutting the superficial MCL/deep MCL increased VR and AMR/AMT in all knee positions except at 90° for VR (P <.05). All reconstructions restored VR to the intact state except at 90° of knee flexion (P <.05). The DB MCL no proximal tibial fixation reconstruction could not restore intact AMR/AMT kinematics in any knee position (P <.05). Adding an anterior-based proximal tibial fixation restored intact AMR/AMT kinematics at ≥30° of knee flexion except at 90° for AMT (P <.05). The SB MCL reconstruction could not restore intact AMR/AMT kinematics at 0° and 90° of knee flexion (P <.05). Conclusion: In this in vitro cadaveric study, a DB MCL reconstruction with anteriorly placed proximal tibial fixation was able to control AMR and AMT better than the gold standard SB MCL reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: In patients with anteromedial rotatory instability and valgus instability, a DB MCL reconstruction may be superior to the SB MCL reconstruction, without causing extra surgical morbidity or additional costs.
- Subjects
MEDIAL collateral ligament (Knee); IN vitro studies; BIOMECHANICS; DATA analysis; RESEARCH funding; MEDICAL cadavers; KINEMATICS; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; ROTATIONAL motion; KNEE joint; STATISTICS; PLASTIC surgery; DATA analysis software; JOINT instability; RANGE of motion of joints
- Publication
American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2024, Vol 52, Issue 8, p1970
- ISSN
0363-5465
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1177/03635465241251463