We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
"CRACKING" THE CODE: INTERPRETING SENTENCE REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS IN FAVOR OF ELIGIBILITY FOR CRACK COCAINE OFFENDERS WHO AVOIDED A MANDATORY MINIMUM FOR THEIR SUBSTANTIAL ASSISTANCE TO AUTHORITIES.
- Authors
DIVITA, CATHERINE
- Abstract
In 2010, the Fair Sentencing Act ("FSA") increased the quantities triggeringmandatory minimums for crack cocaine offenses and directed the U.S. Sentencing Commission ("USSC") to make similar reductions to the crack cocaine guideline ranges. After the USSC made these changes retroactive, offenders sentenced in accordance with the previous scheme sought sentence reductions. Due to the circuit courts' differing interpretations of the eligibility requirements for a reduction, similarly situated offenders who avoided a mandatory minimum for performing substantial assistance to authorities have experienced different outcomes. This Note argues that courts should consistently hold such offenders eligible for retroactive sentencing reductions because this interpretation comports with the text of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and furthers the policy goals behind the FSA, the USSC, and the criminal justice system in general.
- Subjects
UNITED States; SENTENCE reduction (Criminal procedure); CRACK cocaine laws; MANDATORY minimum sentences; CRIMINAL sentencing laws; CRIMINAL sentencing; LEGAL status of drug dealers; CIRCUIT courts; CRIMINAL justice system; UNITED States Sentencing Commission; LAW
- Publication
Boston College Law Review, 2015, Vol 56, Issue 3, p1143
- ISSN
0161-6587
- Publication type
Article