We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Response to MacGregor and McNamee: Risks, relativity, and wrongness.
- Authors
Kious, Brent
- Abstract
The author offers a response to the criticisms made by Oskar MacGregor and Mike McNamee about his arguments on anti-doping in sports. He cites the concerns raised by MacGregor and McNamee such as the old issue of risk and a criticism of his views about coercion. He agrees that the two are correct that he did not argue initially against the so-called Risk Distinction Argument (RDA). He also explores the possibility of linking the RDA to other arguments for the wrongness of doping.
- Subjects
DOPING in sports; DRUG use by athletes; SPORTS medicine; DRUG abuse in sports; SPORTS administration
- Publication
Theoretical Medicine & Bioethics, 2011, Vol 32, Issue 3, p209
- ISSN
1386-7415
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s11017-011-9181-1