We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Automatic Versus Volitional Orienting and the Production of the Inhibition-of-Return Effect.
- Authors
Fitzgeorge, Lyndsay; Buckolz, Eric
- Abstract
A single, to-be-ignored peripheral flash (i.e., cue) reflexively attracts an orienting response (oculomotor/ attention/head turn) that ultimately causes reaction time delays to target stimuli that later arise at this cued location, in relation to when the target appears at a new position (i.e., the inhibition-of-return [IOR] effect). The basic question posed here dealt with whether an IOR effect is also produced following volitional orienting. Results from paired cue-trial stimulations, one a distractor and one a target (nonsalient/salient) event, positioned more or less symmetrically on either side of fixation, supported the net vector model of IOR (R. Klein, J. Christie, & E. P. Morris, 2005). Automatic orienting did not yield an IOR effect at the stimulated positions. When the need to later report cue-trial target location was added, an IOR effect appeared at distractor-occupied, but not at target-occupied, locations. Seemingly, an IOR effect can follow volitional orienting. In this instance, the IOR process seems capable of undergoing modulation; however, such modulation was not evident following automatic orienting.
- Subjects
ORIENTING reflex; REACTION time; CONDITIONED response; STIMULUS synthesis; TISSUE fixation (Histology)
- Publication
Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 2009, Vol 63, Issue 2, p94
- ISSN
1196-1961
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1037/a0013700