We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Euthanasia and Quality of Life: Critique of a Subjective Standard.
- Authors
DiBaise, John K.
- Abstract
Euthanasia advocates argue that end-of-life decisions should be based on patients' autonomous evaluations of their own quality of life. The question is whether a patient's quality of life has deteriorated so far as to make death a benefit. Criteria for evaluating quality of life are, however, unavoidably arbitrary and unjust. The concept is difficult to define, and human autonomy has limits. This essay discusses the moral issues raised by quality-of-life judgments at the end of life: who makes them, what criteria they use, and what clinical actions the conclusions justify. It then looks at ways in which quality of life can be considered legitimately, in relation not to euthanasia, which is always illicit, but to specific proposed treatments. If a patient decides to forgo treatment, the decision should be based on the judgment that the treatment, its side effects, or its long-term consequences would be excessively burdensome or useless.
- Subjects
EUTHANASIA; QUALITY of life; TERMINAL care; CRIMINAL omission; ACT psychology
- Publication
National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 2017, Vol 17, Issue 3, p417
- ISSN
1532-5490
- Publication type
Article