We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
I Know That I Know That I Know: Reflections on Paul John Eakin's "What Are We Reading When We Read Autobiography?".
- Authors
Butte, George
- Abstract
Paul John Eakin's recent article in the "Narrative" periodical in 2005, 'What Are We Reading When We Read Autobiography?,' illustrates, although sometimes inadvertently, the value of reflecting on literary narrative, in this instance autobiography, in light of research in the cognitive sciences. Eakin's particular context is Antonio Damasio's account in "The Feeling of What Happens" of 'extended consciousness' and the 'autobiographical self' as neurobiological phenomena. Eakin raises the provocative possibility that writing about ourselves, like talking about ourselves, 'may be grounded in the neurobiological rhythms of consciousness,' and suggests some outcomes of speculating on this linkage. The speculation is itself grounded in a speculation, since Damasio's description of more complex states of consciousness is, as he readily admits, hypothetical, although a hypothesis built on extensive clinical and research experience. Eakin's speculation is useful for narrative theory, even in its gaps, for the questions and implications that Eakin does not voice are as revealing, I think, as those he does. My resistance to Eakin's and Damasio's conclusions circles around two topics: one, 'the teller-effect' and its erasure of agency; two, the paradoxes of what I call 'the critic effect' and 'deep subjectivity.' The complications, at the least, that I would want to add to Eakin's speculation have large significance for the phenomenology of I-tale-telling.
- Subjects
AUTOBIOGRAPHY; BIOGRAPHIES; NARRATION; LITERATURE; COGNITIVE science; PHILOSOPHY of mind
- Publication
Narrative, 2005, Vol 13, Issue 3, p299
- ISSN
1063-3685
- Publication type
Essay
- DOI
10.1353/nar.2005.0016