We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Another “strategic accession”? The EU and Serbia (2000–2010).
- Authors
Stahl, Bernhard
- Abstract
The South-eastern enlargement currently suffers from defections, compliance problems and blockades; the results of the European Union's policy since 1999 can be called mixed at best. The “Serbian question” – for instance – remains unsolved since Serbia still means a “problem child” of the international community. The thesis generated in this paper is that all of these problems are indicators of a basic identity conflict. This conflict stems from entirely different identities, i.e. world views, perception of the state, political cultures and the meaning of international politics. The EU's enlargement policy – in its ideal type – is precisely meant to overcome this conflict by “Europeanizing” the acceding states. Yet the argument here is that the EU also pursues goals beyond Europeanization – for instance “stabilization” – hence the EU might be interested in accessions despite the fact that the Copenhagen criteria have not been fulfilled. Such “strategic accessions”, as experienced with Romania, Greece and Cyprus, tend to hinder the EU's external governance and foster enlargement fatigue in the long run. The case of Serbia serves as an example for demonstrating that Serbia is not complying with the basic standards of EU integration and that the EU is not really enforcing compliance. As a result, we are heading towards a “strategic accession” in the Serbian case.
- Subjects
SERBIA; EUROPEAN Union membership; EUROPEAN integration; EUROPEANIZATION; INTERNATIONAL relations theory; INTERNATIONAL relations
- Publication
Nationalities Papers, 2013, Vol 41, Issue 3, p447
- ISSN
0090-5992
- Publication type
Case Study
- DOI
10.1080/00905992.2012.743517