We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Low-Value Care and Clinician Engagement in a Large Medicare Shared Savings Program ACO: a Survey of Frontline Clinicians.
- Authors
Markovitz, Adam A.; Rozier, Michael D.; Ryan, Andrew M.; Goold, Susan D.; Ayanian, John Z.; Norton, Edward C.; Peterson, Timothy A.; Hollingsworth, John M.
- Abstract
<bold>Background: </bold>Although the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) created new incentives for organizations to improve healthcare value, Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) have achieved only modest reductions in the use of low-value care.<bold>Objective: </bold>To assess ACO engagement of clinicians and whether engagement was associated with clinicians' reported difficulty implementing recommendations against low-value care.<bold>Design: </bold>Cross-sectional survey of ACO clinicians in 2018.<bold>Participants: </bold>1289 clinicians in the Physician Organization of Michigan ACO, including generalist physicians (18%), internal medicine specialists (16%), surgeons (10%), other physician specialists (27%), and advanced practice providers (29%). Response rate was 34%.<bold>Main Measures: </bold>Primary exposures included clinicians' participation in ACO decision-making, awareness of ACO incentives, perceived influence on practice, and perceived quality improvement. Our primary outcome was clinicians' reported difficulty implementing recommendations against low-value care.<bold>Results: </bold>Few clinicians participated in the decision to join the ACO (3%). Few clinicians were aware of ACO incentives, including knowing the ACO was accountable for both spending and quality (23%), successfully lowered spending (9%), or faced upside risk only (3%). Few agreed (moderately or strongly) the ACO changed compensation (20%), practice (19%), or feedback (15%) or that it improved care coordination (17%) or inappropriate care (13%). Clinicians reported they had difficulty following recommendations against low-value care 18% of the time; clinicians reported patients had difficulty accepting recommendations 36% of the time. Increased ACO awareness (1 standard deviation [SD]) was associated with decreased difficulty (- 2.3 percentage points) implementing recommendations (95% confidence interval [CI] - 3.8, - 0.7), as was perceived quality improvement (1 SD increase, - 2.1 percentage points, 95% CI, - 3.4, - 0.8). Participation in ACO decision-making and perceived influence on practice were not associated with recommendation implementation.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Clinicians participating in a large Medicare ACO were broadly unaware of and unengaged with ACO objectives and activities. Whether low clinician engagement limits ACO efforts to reduce low-value care warrants further longitudinal study.
- Subjects
MICHIGAN; UNITED States; ACCOUNTABLE care organizations; MEDICARE; PERCEIVED quality; STANDARD deviations; RESEARCH; CROSS-sectional method; RESEARCH methodology; COST control; MEDICAL cooperation; EVALUATION research; COMPARATIVE studies; RESEARCH funding; LONGITUDINAL method
- Publication
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2020, Vol 35, Issue 1, p133
- ISSN
0884-8734
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1007/s11606-019-05511-8