We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
What Does Silence Signify? Investigating the Rhetoric of Silence in Berghuis v. Thompkins.
- Authors
Bell, ShelbyP.
- Abstract
This article uses the Supreme Court's opinions in Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010) to show the risks of silence in communication. Theories of rhetorical silence celebrate silences' communicative potential; yet, Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010) offers rhetorical studies scholars an opportunity to examine the value of silence in a new situation, custodial interrogation. In Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010) the Court ruled that, despite nearly three hours of silence during police interrogation, Thompkins's two short utterances constituted a confession, and waived his right to remain silent. This article analyzes Thompkins's silence, first, using rhetorical silence literature, which fails to explain why the Court did not recognize Thompkins's silence as communicative. Then, this article employs H. P. Grice's theory of conversational implicature, which examines ambiguous utterances, to explain how the Court interpreted Thompkins's silence. Reading the Court's opinions through Grice's theory of implicature demonstrates that theories of rhetorical silence hide the risks silence poses for some rhetors.
- Subjects
BERGHUIS v. Thompkins; SILENCE; LEGAL judgments; COMMUNICATION; RHETORIC; MURDER; ARREST
- Publication
Western Journal of Communication, 2014, Vol 78, Issue 2, p175
- ISSN
1057-0314
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1080/10570314.2013.835066