We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
ADMISSIBILITY VERSUS SUFFICIENCY: CONTROLLING THE QUALITY OF EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY.
- Authors
Green, Michael D.; Sanders, Joseph
- Abstract
The article discusses the authors' views about how to control the quality of expert witness testimony in America, and it mentions the U.S. Supreme Court's establishment of a method for assessing the admissibility of expert testimony in federal courts in the 1993 case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. The sufficiency of scientific evidence to support a plaintiff verdict is examined, along with expert evidence cases such as Frye v. United States and In re Agent Orange Prod. Liab. Litig.
- Subjects
UNITED States; EXPERT evidence; QUALITY control; ADMISSIBLE evidence lawsuits; DAUBERT v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc.; VERDICTS; UNITED States Supreme Court history; LEGAL status of plaintiffs; FRYE v. United States (Supreme Court case); ACTIONS &; defenses (Law); TWENTIETH century
- Publication
Wake Forest Law Review, 2015, Vol 50, Issue 5, p1057
- ISSN
0043-003X
- Publication type
Article