We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Should editors influence journal impact factors?
- Authors
Krell, Frank-Thorsten
- Abstract
The journal impact factor is widely used as a performance indicator for single authors (despite its unsuitably in this respect). Hence, authors are increasingly exercised if there is any sign that impact factors are being manipulated. Editors who ask authors to cite relevant papers from their own journal are accused of acting unethically. This is surprising because, besides publishers, authors are the primary beneficiaries of an increased impact factor of the journal in which they publish, and because the citation process is biased anyway. There is growing evidence that quality and relevance are not always the reasons for choosing references. Authors' biases and personal environments as well as strategic considerations are major factors. As long as an editor does not force authors to cite irrelevant papers from their own journal, I consider it as a matter of caretaking for the journal and its authors if an editor brings recent papers to the authors' attention. It would be unfair to authors and disloyal to the publisher if an editor did not try to increase the impact of his/her own journal.
- Subjects
EDITORS; SCHOLARLY periodical editing; IMPACT factor (Citation analysis); AUTHORSHIP; AUTHOR-publisher relations; JOURNAL productivity; INFLUENCE (Literary, artistic, etc.); OBJECTIVITY; ETHICS
- Publication
Learned Publishing, 2010, Vol 23, Issue 1, p59
- ISSN
0953-1513
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1087/20100110