We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
The Supreme Court and bedside rationing.
- Authors
Bloche, M. Gregg; Jacobson, Peter D.; Bloche, M G; Jacobson, P D
- Abstract
Comments on health care in the United States and on the opinion of the Supreme Court in Pegram versus Herdrich, which proclaimed that health care was a matter of national policy. Background on federal law and physician incentives; Details on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA); Why actions taken by the Supreme Court proved to be disappointing.
- Subjects
UNITED States; UNITED States. Supreme Court; MEDICAL care; PUBLIC health; HEALTH care reform; LABOR incentives -- Law &; legislation; MANAGED care plan laws; PAY for performance; HEALTH care rationing laws; COMPARATIVE studies; JURISPRUDENCE; RESEARCH methodology; MEDICAL cooperation; HEALTH policy; RESEARCH; STATE governments; EVALUATION research; EMPLOYEE Retirement Income Security Act of 1974; LAW
- Publication
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 2000, Vol 284, Issue 21, p2776
- ISSN
0098-7484
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1001/jama.284.21.2776