We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Evaluating tree wētā (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae: Hemideina species) as bioindicators for New Zealand national biodiversity monitoring.
- Authors
Watts, Corinne; Stringer, Ian; Innes, John; Monks, Joanne
- Abstract
Indicator taxa are increasingly being used to evaluate the natural environment because they provide both quantified and simplified information about complex phenomena and because they result in huge cost savings compared with monitoring entire biotas. In this paper, we examine the suitability of an iconic New Zealand invertebrate, the tree wētā (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae: Hemideina species), as a bioindicator for invertebrates under a national biodiversity monitoring scheme in New Zealand. Tree wētā are common and widespread in New Zealand, comprising a distinctive component of the native invertebrate fauna, being large-bodied (up to 40 mm in length), relatively long-lived, flightless, and nocturnal. Arboreal tree wētā species are commonly monitored in conservation areas containing scrub or forest, particularly after mammal control, because they can be easily monitored using artificial roosts without harming them and they are readily identified by field workers. We evaluated whether data supported the use of tree wētā as a range of bioindicators for such monitoring and conclude that the arboreal species are good indicators for monitoring the effects of controlling the abundance of insectivorous mammals and that they are likely to be reliable population indicators of taxa sensitive to mammalian predation pressure, especially by rodents. However, it is unlikely that arboreal tree wētā are useful population indicators of habitat change (e.g. degradation and fragmentation) as they commonly survive in exotic vegetation and urban gardens throughout New Zealand. Although poorly studied for indicator value, tree wētā may not be good biodiversity indicators although there are insufficient data to establish this. We recommend further research be undertaken to develop standardised methods for monitoring so that conservation managers and researchers produce results that are consistent and comparable across different locations.
- Subjects
BIOINDICATORS; BIODIVERSITY monitoring; NOCTURNAL animal activity; PREDATION; ENVIRONMENTAL indicators
- Publication
Journal of Insect Conservation, 2017, Vol 21, Issue 4, p583
- ISSN
1366-638X
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s10841-017-9997-8