We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
CLAIM OF MISREPRESENTATION AND FRAUD IN INDUCING A CONTRACT FOR FINANCING THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APARTMENT HOUSE IS ARBITRABLE UNDER GENERAL ARBITRATION CLAUSE.
- Abstract
This article focuses on the court ruling given in the Tonkin v. Holland case. In denying a motion to stay arbitration, the court said: "Petitioner was free to refuse to agree to such a broadly worded arbitration clause or to object thereto whether he was illegally induced to enter into the whole of the contract or not, especially since similar contracts, which his lawyers drafted, contained no such agreement to arbitrate."
- Subjects
LEGAL judgments; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law); ARBITRATION &; award; COMMERCIAL arbitration agreements; CONTRACTS; LAWYERS
- Publication
Arbitration Journal, 1965, Vol 20, Issue 2, p119
- ISSN
0003-7893
- Publication type
Article