We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
IRREDUCIBLE LIFE SENTENCES, CRAIG MINOGUE AND THE CAPACITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTERS TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
- Authors
DYER, ANDREW
- Abstract
Certain commentators have recently doubted whether, as a normative matter, an irreducible life sentence will always breach an offender's human rights. This article argues that it will. Such commentators ignore the fact that certain punishments are 'inhuman or degrading' however proportionate they are, and however much suffering they cause. After noting that there is a clear trend against irreducible life sentences in Europe, the article then contends that a comparison of the relevant European jurisprudence with some recent decisions of the High Court of Australia demonstrates that charters of rights can improve protections for prisoners against laws that objectify and exclude them. The Victorian government's recent disapplication of its charter for the purposes of legislation that removes the possibility of parole from certain named prisoners, however, also indicates that, if future Australian charters are properly to protect prisoners' rights, they might have to be designed differently from existing Australian charters.
- Subjects
HUMAN rights; LIFE sentences; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL status of prisoners; CHARTERS; AUSTRALIA. High Court
- Publication
University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2020, Vol 43, Issue 2, p484
- ISSN
0313-0096
- Publication type
Article