We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Democracy and (the essential content of) fundamental rights: marching in line or precarious balancing act?
- Authors
SCHAKS, NILS
- Abstract
This article addresses the question of how democracy and fundamental rights interplay, and compares German and South African law for this purpose. The author argues that democracy requires and presupposes fundamental rights, but that these two values do not always align, and then deals with the question of how to reconcile democracy and fundamental rights in case of conflict. The potential conflict between the two values is sometimes reflected in the relationship between Parliaments as the embodiment of democracy and the Constitutional Courts as the embodiments of fundamental rights (the so- called "counter-majoritarian dilemma"). However, the author rejects the recent critique by some scholars that the German Federal Constitutional Court structurally exceeds its powers visà- vis the German Parliament and that there is a permanent judicial overreach. On the contrary, the author argues that Constitutional Courts do not have sufficient tools to counter a democratic backsliding, i.e. the incremental erosion of democracy. Since the author considers democratic backsliding to be a greater and more acute threat to democracy than judicial overreach, he presents the view that the guarantee of the essential content of a right delineates the minimum of a fundamental right in a democratic society. This view is explained using freedom of expression as example.
- Subjects
CIVIL rights; CONSTITUTIONAL courts; DEMOCRACY; RECIDIVISM rates; FEDERAL courts; SEPARATION of powers; SEXUAL freedom
- Publication
Law, Democracy & Development, 2019, Vol 23, p299
- ISSN
2077-4907
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.17159/2077-4907/2019/ldd.v23b12