We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
DO YOU UNDERSTAND YOUR RIGHTS AS I HAVE READ THEM TO YOU? UNDERSTANDING THE WARNINGS FIFTY YEARS POST MIRANDA.
- Authors
Powell, Jessica L.
- Abstract
The article discusess Miranda v. Arizona court case. Court held that inculpatory and exculpatory statements made in response to interrogation by a defendant in police custody will be admissible at trial only if the prosecution can show that the defendant was informed of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning and of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning, and that the defendant not only understood these rights, but voluntarily waived them.
- Subjects
MIRANDA v. Arizona; RIGHT to counsel; WAIVER of right to counsel; POLICE questioning; SELF-incrimination
- Publication
Northern Kentucky Law Review, 2016, Vol 43, Issue 3, p435
- ISSN
0198-8549
- Publication type
Article