We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
The Principia's second law (as Newton understood it) from Galileo to Laplace.
- Authors
Pourciau, Bruce
- Abstract
Newton certainly regarded his second law of motion in the Principia as a fundamental axiom of mechanics. Yet the works that came after the Principia, the major treatises on the foundations of mechanics in the eighteenth century—by Varignon, Hermann, Euler, Maclaurin, d'Alembert, Euler (again), Lagrange, and Laplace—do not record, cite, discuss, or even mention the Principia's statement of the second law. Nevertheless, the present study shows that all of these scientists do in fact assume the principle that the Principia's second law asserts as a fundamental axiom in their mechanics. (For what that second law asserts, we rely on Newton's own testimony.) Some, like Varignon and Hermann, assume the axiom implicitly, apparently unaware that any assumption is being made, while others, like Maclaurin and Euler, assume the axiom explicitly, apparently unaware that the assertion assumed is the second law as Newton himself understood it. But in every case these scientists employ the principle asserted by the Principia's second law fundamentally, unaware that they should be citing Neutonus, Prin., Phil. Nat. Math., Lex II.
- Subjects
GALILEI, Galileo, 1564-1642; LAPLACE distribution; NEWTON, Isaac, 1642-1727; VARIGNON'S theorem; MACLAURIN'S series (Mathematics)
- Publication
Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 2020, Vol 74, Issue 3, p183
- ISSN
0003-9519
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s00407-019-00242-y