We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Murder Appeals, Delayed Executions, and the Origins of Jamaican Death Penalty Jurisprudence.
- Authors
Campbell, James
- Abstract
In December 1993, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council ruled in Pratt and Morgan v. The Attorney General for Jamaica that excessive delay in the enforcement of death sentences—defined with some caveats as more than 5 years from the time of conviction to execution—was “inhuman” and therefore unconstitutional. The Judicial Committee also reversed earlier rulings in finding that the 5 year time frame for appeals should include those delays that resulted from legal proceedings initiated by prisoners themselves. The result was to clear death row cells across most of the British Caribbean, with the capital sentences of more than 100 condemned prisoners commuted in Jamaica alone. Pratt also ushered in a new era of Judicial Committee activism in Caribbean death penalty cases that resulted in a series of further safeguards against executions, including the abolition of mandatory death sentences. The cumulative effect of these judgments is that there has not been an execution in Jamaica since 1988, even though capital punishment remains legal and, amidst persistently high rates of violent crime across the region, political support for a resumption of hanging is strong.
- Subjects
JAMAICA; CAPITAL punishment; APPELLATE procedure; HISTORY of courts; GREAT Britain. Privy Council. Judicial Committee; JURISPRUDENCE -- History; JAMAICAN history; HISTORY of appellate courts; JUSTICE administration -- History; TWENTIETH century; HISTORY
- Publication
Law & History Review, 2015, Vol 33, Issue 2, p435
- ISSN
0738-2480
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1017/S0738248015000103