We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
El caso de Gustavo Petro vs. Colombia: un estudio de convencionalidad y constitucionalidad.
- Authors
Arenas Mendoza, Hugo Andrés
- Abstract
At the case of Petro Urrego vs Colombia by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in 2022, in favour of the plaintiff, proved that the disciplinary sanctions interposed by the control bodies of an administrative nature are opposing the constitutional rights and the conventional rights, because can violet rights of the candidate and the voters, for example, the due process, the good name, the right to elect and be elected and the facility to put the same democratic institutions at risk and, as a consequence, is required to arrange the Colombian legal system forward this direction. Likewise, it proves that the judges are mandated to impose the sanctions with higher adverse effects on citizens, after due process and following the guidelines by the American Convention on Human Rights, including the decision by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights or statements without an effect for noncompliance with said precepts.
- Subjects
COLOMBIA; INTER-American Court of Human Rights; DUE process of law; CIVIL rights; JUSTICE administration; HUMAN rights; JUDGES; NONCOMPLIANCE
- Publication
A&C - Administrative & Constitutional Law Review - Revista de Direito Administrativo e Constitucional, 2022, Vol 22, Issue 90, p35
- ISSN
1516-3210
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.21056/aec.v22i90.1726