We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Validating hidden Markov models for seabird behavioural inference.
- Authors
Akeresola, Rebecca A.; Butler, Adam; Jones, Esther L.; King, Ruth; Elvira, Víctor; Black, Julie; Robertson, Gail
- Abstract
Understanding animal movement and behaviour can aid spatial planning and inform conservation management. However, it is difficult to directly observe behaviours in remote and hostile terrain such as the marine environment. Different underlying states can be identified from telemetry data using hidden Markov models (HMMs). The inferred states are subsequently associated with different behaviours, using ecological knowledge of the species. However, the inferred behaviours are not typically validated due to difficulty obtaining 'ground truth' behavioural information. We investigate the accuracy of inferred behaviours by considering a unique data set provided by Joint Nature Conservation Committee. The data consist of simultaneous proxy movement tracks of the boat (defined as visual tracks as birds are followed by eye) and seabird behaviour obtained by observers on the boat. We demonstrate that visual tracking data is suitable for our study. Accuracy of HMMs ranging from 71% to 87% during chick‐rearing and 54% to 70% during incubation was generally insensitive to model choice, even when AIC values varied substantially across different models. Finally, we show that for foraging, a state of primary interest for conservation purposes, identified missed foraging bouts lasted for only a few seconds. We conclude that HMMs fitted to tracking data have the potential to accurately identify important conservation‐relevant behaviours, demonstrated by a comparison in which visual tracking data provide a 'gold standard' of manually classified behaviours to validate against. Confidence in using HMMs for behavioural inference should increase as a result of these findings, but future work is needed to assess the generalisability of the results, and we recommend that, wherever feasible, validation data be collected alongside GPS tracking data to validate model performance. This work has important implications for animal conservation, where the size and location of protected areas are often informed by behaviours identified using HMMs fitted to movement data.
- Subjects
WILDLIFE conservation; NATURE conservation; HIDDEN Markov models; ANIMAL mechanics; ANIMAL behavior; CHICKS; PROTECTED areas
- Publication
Ecology & Evolution (20457758), 2024, Vol 14, Issue 3, p1
- ISSN
2045-7758
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1002/ece3.11116